Mar 17, 2016  Symtom. In the ACTUPG or ACTTRANS phase the RDDMASGL DDIC activation job was aborted with a dump. Error example: Checks after phase MAINSHDRUN/ACTUPG were negative! SAP ABAP Message Class RSAR Message Number 011 (Activation terminated) - SAP Datasheet - The Best Online SAP Object Repository. The Best Online SAP Object Repository. Common Issues. Skip to end of metadata. The AckRequested header of WS-RM message from Netweaver 7.31 is no longer suppo. Proxy generation terminated: Message.

• Activation Terminated Message No. Rsar011 Day

Contents.Purpose 'The system was established to provide the with an expeditious method of communicating with the American public in the event of war, threat of war, or grave national crisis.' The Emergency Broadcast System replaced on August 5, 1963.

In later years, it was expanded for use during peacetime emergencies at the state and local levels.Although the system was never used for a national emergency, it was activated more than 20,000 times between 1976 and 1996 to broadcast civil emergency messages and warnings of severe weather hazards.National Level EBS An order to activate the EBS at the national level would have originated with the and been relayed via the duty officer to one of two origination points – either the (ADC) or the Federal Preparedness Agency (FPA) – as the system stood in 1978. Participating telecommunications, and, the, and would receive and authenticate (by means of code words) an (EAN) via an EAN teletypewriter network designed specifically for this purpose. These recipients would relay the EAN to their subscribers and affiliates.The release of the EAN by the Aerospace Defense Command or the Federal Preparedness Agency would initiate a process by which the common carriers would link otherwise independent networks such as, and into a single national network from which even could receive programming. 'Broadcast stations would have used the 2-tone Attention Signal on their assigned broadcast frequency to alert other broadcast stations to stand by for a message from the President.' The transmission of programming on a broadcast station's assigned frequency, and the fact that television networks/stations and FM radio stations could participate, distinguished EBS from CONELRAD. EBS radio stations would not necessarily transmit on 640 or 1240 on the AM dial, and FM radio and television would carry the same audio program as AM radio stations did.Activation procedure Actual activations originated with a primary station, which would transmit the. The Attention Signal most commonly associated with the system was a combination of the sine waves of 853 and 960 ‍—‌suited to attention due to its unpleasantness.

Decoders at relay stations would sound an alarm, alerting station personnel to the incoming message. Then, each relay station would broadcast the alert tone and rebroadcast the emergency message from the primary station. The Attention Signal was developed in the mid-1960s.A nationwide activation of the EBS was called an Emergency Action Notification (EAN), and was the only activation that stations were not allowed to ignore; the made local civil emergencies, weather advisories optional (except for stations that agreed to be the 'primary' source of such messages).To activate the EAN protocol, the and would notify stations with a special message. It began with a full inside the machine would sound ten times.

To avoid abuse and mistakes, the message included a confirmation password which changed daily. Stations that subscribed to one of the wire services were not required to activate the EBS if the activation message did not have proper confirmation. False alarm of 1971 A properly authenticated Emergency Action Notification was incorrectly sent to United States broadcast stations at 9:33 a.m. On February 20, 1971.

At the usual time, a weekly EAN test was performed. NORAD teletype operator, W. Eberhardt had three tapes in front of him: a test tape, and 2 tapes indicating a real emergency, instructing the use of EAN Message #1, and #2, respectively. He inadvertently used the wrong tape, with codeword 'HATEFULNESS'. This message ordered stations to cease regular programming immediately, and begin an Emergency Action Notification using Message #1. Message 1 states that regular programming has been interrupted at the request of the United States government, but is not specific about the cause. A cancellation message was sent at 9:59 a.m.

EST, but it used an incorrect codeword. A cancellation message with the correct codeword, 'IMPISH', was not sent until 10:13 a.m. EST After 40 minutes and six incorrect or improperly formatted cancellation messages, the accidental activation was officially terminated.This demonstrated major flaws in the practical implementation of an EAN.

Over 2,500 radio and television stations received the notification. Some stations ignored it (convinced it was false because it came at the time of a scheduled test) and continued with regular programming. Others cancelled the EAN prematurely, with or without an any coded indication that the alert was erroneous. Still other stations did not have EAN procedure documents readily accessible to them, so they had no indication of what to do at all. It is estimated that only 20% of the stations that received the activation followed the procedures completely. Several stations went off the air, as they were instructed to do. Recordings from stations that did not (and were not supposed to according to EAN procedures) include one from in,.

Another recording of the EAN activation on in / can be heard on.This false alarm was sufficiently disruptive to move the FCC to temporarily suspend use and testing of Emergency Action Notifications (EANs) by codeword effective February 25, 1971. In the meantime, a national EBS activation (actual or test) would be routed through news service broadcast desks, then authenticated with the White House communications center, introducing a delay of approximately one minute.

Numerous investigations were launched, and several changes were made to the EBS. Among them, EAN Message #2, which contains specific language indicating an imminent attack, was eliminated.

Another change was moving the tapes for genuine alerts away from the broadcasting machines to prevent them being mistaken for the weekly test tapes. After numerous safeguards were put in place, the FCC voted to resume automatic national activation of the EBS using EANs in mid-December, 1972, almost 20 months after they were suspended. Seven years later, a radio station in Arizona, KRFM (now ) accidentally played the EBS activation for a brief few seconds, making it an actual fail in the middle of their station ID.System uses. Video slide from a prerecorded announcement of the beginning of an EAN from, in 1985, during the period of the Emergency Broadcast System.

This EAN announcement was never seen on the airwaves of WGN-TV itself, but was posted to in March 2017.Though it was never used, the FCC's EBS plan involved detailed procedures for stations to follow during an EAN. It included precise scripts that announcers were to read at the outset of the emergency, as well as whenever detailed information was scarce. Among other things, citizens were instructed not to use the telephone, but rather continue listening to broadcast stations for information.The initial scripted announcement was: 'We interrupt this program. This is a national emergency. The President of the United States or his designated representative will appear shortly over the Emergency Broadcast System.' As official information began to emerge from various sources, non-primary stations were to broadcast it according to the following priority list:. Messages from the.

Statewide emergency information. Local emergency information (for a station's operational area, i.e. Evacuation and sheltering plans, and ). National programming and news (other than a presidential message)A presidential message was always required to be aired live during an EAN. For other information, stations were to follow the priority list to decide what should be disseminated first. Lower priority official programming was to be recorded for the earliest available rebroadcast.Participation in EAN emergency broadcasting was done with the 'voluntary cooperation' of each station (as noted in the classic test announcement).

Stations that were not prepared to be part of the national EBS network were classified as 'non-participating' by the FCC. During an EAN, a non-participating station was required to advise listeners/viewers to tune elsewhere to find emergency bulletins. The station's transmitter would then be turned off. Non-participating stations had to remain off the air until the EAN was terminated. Under no circumstances could any broadcast station continue with normal programming during a national emergency.Testing the system Until the system was superseded, radio and television stations were required to perform a Weekly Transmission Test Of The Attention Signal and Test Script at random days and times between 8:30 a.m. And local sunset. Stations were required to perform the test at least once a week, and were only exempt from doing so if they had activated the EBS for a state or local emergency, or participated in a coordinated state or local EBS test during the past week.

Additionally, stations were required to log tests they received from each station they monitored for EBS messages. This served as an additional check, as these stations could expect to hear a weekly test from each source. Failure to receive a signal at least once a week meant that either the monitored station was having a problem transmitting the alert signal, or the monitoring station was having a problem receiving it.Original plan Early on, tests and activations were initiated in a similar way to CONELRAD tests. Primary stations would turn their transmitters off for five seconds, back on for five seconds, off for five seconds more, then would go back on air and transmit a 1000 Hz tone for 15 seconds to alert secondary stations. Television stations adhere to similar rules, but stations switch only their sound carriers off. This quick off-and-on became known to broadcast engineers as the 'EBS Stress Test', as older transmitters would sometimes fail after the quick cycling on and off. This became unnecessary as broadcast technology advanced and the two-tone alarm was developed.Later test pattern Beginning in 1976, the old CONELRAD signaling method (the 'EBS Stress Test') was scrapped in favor of the following procedure:1.

Normal programming was suspended, though tests were typically done during commercial breaks for continuity reasons. Television stations would transmit a video slide such as the one illustrated at the beginning of the article; numerous designs were available over the years. One of the following announcements was transmitted:. ' This is a test.

For the next sixty (or thirty) seconds, this station will conduct a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. This is only a test.' . '(name of host station in a particular market) is conducting a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. This is only a test.' (mainly radio stations used this particular announcement).

' This is a test. (Name of Host Station) is conducting a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. This is only a test.' . ' This is a test.

This station is conducting a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. This is only a test.' . ' This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. This is only a test.' .

' The following is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System.' . ' This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System.

Important information will follow this tone.' Alternatively, the name 'Emergency Broadcasting System' could be used.2. The Attention Signal was transmitted from the EBS encoder for 20 to 25 seconds. At the special request of the FCC, however, this step was occasionally (though rarely) skipped. In mid-1995, a new rule was put in place that gave stations the option to transmit the attention signal for anywhere from eight to 25 seconds.3. The announcement written below (depending on the variation) was transmitted.

The first part read:. ' This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. The broadcasters of your area in voluntary cooperation with the FCC and other authorities (or, in later years, 'federal, state and local authorities') have developed this system to keep you informed in the event of an emergency.' .

' This is a test of the Emergency Broadcast System. Broadcasters, in cooperation with the FCC and other authorities (or, in later years, 'federal, state and local authorities') have developed this system to keep you informed in the event of an emergency.' There were a number of variations for the second half of the statement. During the system's early days, stations other than the designated primary station for an operational area were required to shut down in the event of an emergency (reminiscent of the CONELRAD days), and the message was a variation of:.

' If this had been an actual emergency, you would have been instructed to tune to one of the broadcast stations in your area.' .

' If this had been an actual emergency, you would have been instructed where to tune in your area for news and official information.' By the early 1980s, it was easier for stations to record and relay messages from a primary station, and the risk of hostile bombers using broadcast signals to navigate lessened due to the development of. As a result, the requirement to shut down during an activation of the system was dropped, and the message became:. ' If this had been an actual emergency, the Attention Signal you just heard would have been followed by official information, news, or instructions.' Some stations also listed the types of emergencies that the EBS would be activated for (i.e., or ); the test conducted by in made explicit reference to an attack on the United States as being a possible scenario for EBS activation. In the late 1980s, several television stations in the area had specific test scripts that emphasized earthquake preparedness.As the EBS was about to be replaced by its successor, the, in the mid-1990s some stations used the following message:. ' This station is testing its Emergency Broadcast System equipment.

The EBS will soon be replaced with the Emergency Alert System; the EAS will provide timely emergency warnings.' The test concluded with one of the following phrases:. '(Sponsoring station) serves (the name of operational area).

This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System.' . 'Stations of the (name of the station network, for example: South Dakota Public Broadcasting Network) serve all operational areas in (name of state). This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System.'

(used mostly by statewide and/or radio networks). ' This station serves the (name of operational area). This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System.' . 'This station serves (the name of operational area). This concludes this Emergency Broadcast System Test.' (mainly used by stations that used the This Station is testing its Emergency Broadcast System equipment variant).

' This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System serving the (name of operational area). '. ' This concludes this test of the Emergency Broadcast System on (name of station). 'These variations were heard in different parts of the country throughout the years depending on FCC regulations at the time, local preferences, and whether the specific station performing the test was a primary EBS station or not. The announcement text was mandated by the FCC.

Stations had the option of either reading the test script live, or using recorded versions. Radio in, and radio in, New York both had a sung version of the most common script. There was also a version done by Los Angeles-based Cheap Radio Thrills, as well as another by the comedy team of. The FCC declared it illegal to sing the test message, or read it as a joke. However, it was acceptable to read it in another language (for example, or ), if a station broadcast in a language other than.

Copies of the had a note saying that it was acceptable to broadcast in any other language, so long as it was broadcast in English as well. Usually the post-test recorded announcement began with the phrase, 'This has been a test of the Emergency Broadcast System.' , followed by the here-in-above stated recitations.Purpose of the test and cultural impact The purpose of the test was to allow the FCC and broadcasters to verify that EBS tone transmitters and decoders were functioning properly. In addition to the weekly test, test activations of the entire system were conducted periodically for many years. These tests showed that about 80% of broadcast outlets nationwide would carry emergency programming within a period of five minutes when the system was activated.The weekly broadcasts of the EBS attention signal and test script made it a significant part of the American cultural fabric of its time, and became the subject of a great number of jokes and skits, such as the sung versions of the test script in the late 1970s. In addition, many people have testified to being frightened by the test patterns and attention signal as children.Criticism Although intended for the President to communicate with the American people in the event of a national emergency, many critics questioned whether the EBS would work in an actual emergency scenario. Curt Beckmann of expressed his doubts about the system's effectiveness in a 1984 interview:I'll tell you why it probably wouldn't work, because if the President has a national emergency, he will call in the national radio and television networks, and presto, he will communicate with us.

If those networks are somehow incapacitated, and he has to go to the EBS as a backup, it's inconceivable the rest of us will be up and running if the networks aren't up and running. See also.

^ Emergency Broadcast System: The Lifesaving Public Service Program, United States Defense Civil Preparedness Agency, March 1978. 'City's Civil Defense Sirens Will Be Tested Tomorrow', The New York Times, New York, NY, p. 30, October 5, 1963. ^.

CONELRAD Adjacent. Retrieved 7 October 2013.

(Timestamp to WCCO white card script instruction) 2001scoop, W6LDS (2012-09-16), retrieved 2018-05-22. Archived from on 2014-10-16. Retrieved 2018-05-22.

^. Retrieved 2018-05-22. ^. Archived from on 21 January 2013. Retrieved 7 October 2013. ^ AP (1971-02-21). The Lawton Constitution and Morning Press.

Retrieved 2018-05-22 – via Newspapers.com. AP (1971-02-26). The News-Item.

Retrieved 2018-05-22 – via Newspapers.com. The Los Angeles Times.

Retrieved 2018-05-22 – via Newspapers.com. (First Revision ed.). Washington, DC: Department of Defense. 4 August 1967. Retrieved 27 October 2017.

Sound carrier only for TV stations., FCC Report and Order 94-288, Paragraph II(4), Nov 10 1994, accessed August 15, 2011. The attack warning script has a note that says it can be read out in any language other than English, if it broadcasts in that language.Further reading.

MacDonald, John (November 24, 1996). Los Angeles Times.External links.

by Cecil Adams, Chicago Reader. with scans of relevant Teletype messages and immediately following UPI story. Real Audio. is required to hear this file. The convergent role of each government agency.

You might run into one of these error messages while activating data in a DataStore object (DSO) either manually or from a process chain: “Activation of M records from DataStore object terminated” “Resource error. No batch process available. Process terminated” “Time limit exceeded.

No return of the split processes”When you create a DSO, the system sets a system ID of SIDs Generation upon Activation by default. It is a check box option in the edit mode settings of the DSO. If this option is checked, the system checks the SID values for all of the characteristics in the DSO. If a SID value for the particular characteristic doesn’t exist, then the system generates the SIDs. So the SIDs Generation upon Activation option helps to improve the performance of the query as the system doesn’t have to generate SIDs at query runtime.The general understanding is that the error messages in above Figure during activation of a DSO are due to the SIDs Generation upon Activation setting.

However, we will show that the error messages are not due to this setting, but rather to incorrect parameterization of the processes to activate requests. This means that several background processes were running simultaneously (i.e., activation of requests in DSO and SID creation), resulting in the termination of the request. If a process chain is used for activation of a DSO, all the above processes still run simultaneously in the background.

You can use transaction RZ04 to check how many background processes are available in the system at the time of load.You can change the runtime parameters for this affected DSO by going to transaction RSODSOSETTINGS. Note that transaction RSCUSTA2 is obsolete in SAP NetWeaver BI 7.0. In the RSODSOSETTINGS screen select the DSO in question, Click on the Change button to change the runtime parameter. On the Maintenance of Runtime Param. Screen click on the Change Process Params.

Button under Parameter for Activation as the issue right now is an activation error.Alternatively, you can get to this screen from the context menu of the DSO by selecting Manage, which is the activation request that failed. Click on the Activate button just as you would to activate a request that is loaded to the activation queue. The Activate Data in DSO window pops up. Click on the Activate in Parallel button. A pop-up window displays the process type ODSACTIVAT.Maximum Wait Time for Process is set to 300 seconds by default, but you can increase it to a higher value if you think the system workload will be high.

If you choose Dialog process as an option. Then SAP recommends that the wait time in SAP NetWeaver BI should be three times higher than in R/3 (SAP Note 1118205). SAP Note 192658 also recommends that you set the maximum runtime for the work process as 3,600 seconds. After you click on the Change Process Params.

Activation Terminated Message No. Rsar011 Day

Button, you see the settings window.Enter the Number of Processes. Under Parallel Processing, select Dialog. Select parallel generators in Server Group for Parallel Dialog Processing and then click on the save icon. You can re-initiate the failed activation again and the data should be activated now without any issues.After the successful activation of data in the DSO, you can revert back to the normal settings for the DSO if necessary to avoid having too many dialog processes. If the activation of data in the DSO is done through process chains (transaction RSPC), you can access the settings. If many DSOs are failing in activation and the above parameters have to be changed for all of these DSOs, then SAP recommends updating the table RSBATCHPARALLEL directly. However, one should have security access to change the data in the tables directly and the steps we describe are easier to perform for individual DSOs.